Bibliography thomas aquinas

Includes parallel Latin text. Does not yet include the Supplementum, which will appear in a two-volume set with a comparison to the Scriptum super libros Sententiarum, from which it was taken. In every case these are followed by an exposition of the Gospel taken from the Catena Aurea of St Thomas Aquinas which in turn is followed by two or more sermons on relevant points in the Gospel.

The first inaugural lecture, based on Ps Part 1 only. Based on the work of the Leonine Commission; includes parallel Latin and the Greek text of the gospel, as well as the missing texts of Mt — and — Proem, 1. Thomas himself did not proceed past 1. The earlier edition is also at www. Available from ProQuest as item Until this appears, non-Latinists may find some of its remarks on beauty translated in Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy, Coomaraswamy, vol.

With facing Latin text. In progress: the first four of the five articles are complete. This is a partial translation of De veritate, q. This is q. Contains 1.

Bibliography thomas aquinas: Thomas Aquinas (ca. –).

In the first edition of Aquinas's opera omnia, the so-called editio Piana from Pius Vthe Dominican pope who commissioned itwas produced at the studium of the Roman convent at Santa Maria sopra Minervathe forerunner of the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum. English editions: Joseph Rickaby London,J. Ashley London, Contents move to sidebar bibliography thomas aquinas.

Article Talk. Read Edit View history. Tools Tools. Download as PDF Printable version. In other projects. Wikimedia Commons Wikidata item. Twelve quodlibetal disputations Philosophical commentaries Eleven commentaries on Aristotle ; Two expositions of works by Boethius ; Two expositions of works by Proclus Lesser tractates and disputations Five polemical works; Five expert opinions, or responsa ; Fifteen letters on theological, philosophical, or political subjects; Ninety-nine Homilies Upon the Epistles and Gospels for Forty-nine Sundays of the Year A collection of glosses from the Church Fathers on the Gospels Catena aurea Systematic works Summa TheologiaeSumma contra Gentilesand commentary on Peter Lombard's Sentences Biblical commentaries on JobPsalms and IsaiahCanticles and JeremiahJohnMatthewand on the epistles of Paul Nine exegeses of Scriptural books Liturgical works Editions [ edit ].

Works in chronological order [ edit ]. Thomas argued that God, while perfectly united, also is perfectly described by Three Interrelated Persons. These three persons Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are constituted by their relations within the essence of God. Thomas wrote that the term "Trinity" "does not mean the relations themselves of the Persons, but rather the number of persons related to each other; and hence it is that the word in itself does not express regard to another.

This eternal generation then produces an eternal Spirit "who enjoys the divine nature as the Love of God, the Love of the Father for the Word. This Trinity exists independently from the world. It transcends the created world, but the Trinity also decided to give grace to human beings. This takes place through the Incarnation of the Word in the person of Jesus Christ and through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit within those who have experienced salvation by God; according to Aidan Nichols.

Thomas's five proofs for the existence of God take some of Aristotle's assertions concerning the principles of being.

Bibliography thomas aquinas: Thomas's best-known works are the unfinished

For God as prima "bibliography thomas aquinas" "first cause" comes from Aristotle's concept of the unmoved mover and asserts that God is the ultimate cause of all things. In the Summa Theologica, Thomas begins his discussion of Jesus Christ by recounting the biblical story of Adam and Eve and by describing the negative effects of original sin.

The purpose of Christ's Incarnation was to restore human nature by removing the contamination of sinwhich humans cannot do by themselves. Thomas argued against several specific contemporary and historical theologians who held differing views about Christ. In response to PhotinusThomas stated that Jesus was truly divine and not simply a human being.

Against Nestoriuswho suggested that the Son of God was merely conjoined to the man Christ, Thomas argued that the fullness of God was an integral part of Christ's existence. However, countering Apollinaris ' views, Thomas held that Christ had a truly human rational soulas well. This produced a duality of nature in Christ. Thomas argued against Eutyches that this duality persisted after the Incarnation.

Thomas stated that these two natures existed simultaneously yet distinguishably in one real human body, unlike the teachings of Manichaeus and Valentinus. With respect to Paul 's assertion that Christ, "though he was in the form of God Following the Council of NicaeaAugustine of Hippoas well as the assertions of Scripture, Thomas held the doctrine of divine immutability.

For Thomas, "the mystery of Incarnation was not completed through God being changed in any way from the state in which He had been from eternity, but through His having united Himself to the creature in a new way, or rather through having united it to Himself. Similarly, Thomas explained that Christ "emptied Himself, not by putting off His divine nature, but by assuming a human nature.

But human nature and the soul are not full, but capable of bibliography thomas aquinas, because it was made as a slate not written upon. Therefore, human nature is empty. In short, "Christ had a real body of the same nature of ours, a true rational souland, together with these, perfect Deity ". Thus, there is both unity in his one hypostasis and composition in his two natures, human and Divine in Christ.

I answer that, The Person or hypostasis of Christ may be viewed in two ways. First as it is in itself, and thus it is altogether simple, even as the Nature of the Word. Secondly, in the aspect of person or hypostasis to which it belongs to subsist in a nature; and thus the Person of Christ subsists in two natures. Hence though there is one subsisting being in Him, yet there are different aspects of subsistence, and hence He is said to be a composite person, insomuch as one being subsists in two.

Thomas Aquinas identified the goal of human existence as union and eternal fellowship with God. This goal is achieved through the beatific visionin which a person experiences perfect, unending happiness by seeing the essence of God. The vision occurs after death as a gift from God to those who in life experienced salvation and redemption through Christ.

The goal of union with God has implications for the individual's life on earth. Thomas stated that an individual's will must be ordered toward the right things, such as charity, peace, and holiness. He saw this orientation as also the way to happiness. Indeed, Thomas ordered his treatment of the moral life around the idea of happiness. The relationship between will and goal is antecedent in nature "because rectitude of the will consists in being duly ordered to the last end [that is, the beatific vision].

Such love requires morality and bears fruit in everyday human choices. Thomas Aquinas belonged to the Dominican Order formally Ordo Praedicatorumthe Order of Preachers which began as an order dedicated to the conversion of the Albigensians and other heterodox factions, at first by peaceful means; later the Albigensians were dealt with by means of the Albigensian Crusade.

In the Summa Theologiaehe wrote:. With regard to heretics two points must be observed: one, on their own side; the other, on the side of the Church. On their own side there is the sin, whereby they deserve not only to be separated from the Church by excommunication, but also to be severed from the world by death. For it is a much graver matter to corrupt the faith that quickens the soul, than to forge money, which supports temporal life.

Wherefore if forgers of money and other evil-doers are forthwith condemned to death by the secular authority, much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death. On the part of the Church, however, there is mercy, which looks to the conversion of the wanderer, wherefore she condemns not at once, but "after the first and second admonition", as the Apostle directs: after that, if he is yet stubborn, the Church no longer hoping for his conversion, looks to the salvation of others, by excommunicating him and separating him from the Church, and furthermore delivers him to the secular tribunal to be exterminated thereby from the world by death.

Heresy was a capital offence against the secular law of most European countries of the 13th century. Kings and emperors, even those at war with the papacy, listed heresy first among the crimes against the state. Kings claimed power from God according to the Christian faith. Often enough, especially in that age of papal claims to universal worldly power, the rulers' power was tangibly and visibly legitimated directly through coronation by the pope.

Simple theft, forgery, fraud, and other such crimes were also capital offences; Thomas's point seems to be that the gravity of this offence, which touches not only the material goods but also the spiritual goods of others, is at least the same as forgery. Thomas's suggestion specifically demands that heretics be handed to a "secular tribunal" rather than magisterial authority.

That Thomas specifically says that heretics "deserve Although the life of a heretic who repents should be spared, the former heretic should be executed if he relapses into heresy. Thomas elaborates on his opinion regarding heresy in the next bibliography thomas aquinas, when he says:. In God's tribunal, those who return are always received, because God is a searcher of hearts, and knows those who return in sincerity.

But the Church cannot imitate God in this, for she presumes that those who relapse after being once received, are not sincere in their return; hence she does not debar them from the way of salvation, but neither does she protect them from the sentence of death. For this reason the Church not only admits to Penance those who return from heresy for the first time, but also safeguards their lives, and sometimes by dispensation, restores them to the ecclesiastical dignities which they may have had before, should their conversion appear to be sincere: we read of this as having frequently been done for the good of peace.

But when they fall again, after having been received, this seems to prove them to be inconstant in faith, wherefore when they return again, they are admitted to Penance, but are not delivered from the pain of death. For Jews, Thomas argues for toleration of both their persons and their religious rites. The position taken by Thomas was that if children were being reared in error, the Church had no authority to intervene.

The pope noted that the position of Aquinas had been more widely held among theologians and canon lawyersthan that of John Duns Scotus. A mention of witchcraft appears in the Summa Theologicae [ ] and concludes that the church does not treat temporary or permanent impotence attributed to a spell any differently to that of natural causes, as far as an impediment to marriage.

Under the canon Episcopichurch doctrine held that witchcraft was not possible and any practitioners of sorcery were deluded and their acts an illusion. Thomas Aquinas was cited in a new doctrine that included the belief in witches. This was a departure from the teachings of his master Albertus Magnus whose doctrine was based in the Episcopi.

The famous 15th-century witch-hunter's manual, the Malleus Maleficarumalso written by a member of the Dominican Order, begins by quoting Thomas Aquinas "Commentary on Pronouncements" Sent. A grasp of Thomas's psychology is essential for understanding his beliefs about the afterlife and resurrection. Thomas, following church doctrine, accepts that the soul continues to exist after the death of the body.

Because he accepts that the soul is the form of the body, then he also must believe that the human being, like all material things, is form-matter composite. The substantial form the human soul configures prime matter the physical body and is the form by which a material composite belongs to that species it does; in the case of human beings, that species is a rational animal.

Matter cannot exist without being configured by form, but form can exist without matter—which allows for the separation of soul from body. Thomas says that the soul shares in the material and spiritual worlds, and so has some features of matter and other, immaterial, features such as access to universals. The human soul is different from other material and spiritual things; it is created by God, but also comes into existence only in the material body.

Human beings are material, but the human person can survive the death of the body through the continued existence of the soul, which persists. The human soul straddles the spiritual and material worlds, and is both a configured subsistent form as well as a configurer of matter into that of a living, bodily human. Because the human being is a soul-matter composite, the body has a part in what it is to be human.

Perfected human nature consists in the human dual nature, embodied and intellecting. Resurrection appears to require dualism, which Thomas rejects. Yet Thomas believes the soul persists after the death and corruption of the body, and is capable of existence, separated from the body between the time of death and the resurrection of the flesh.

Thomas believes in a different sort of dualism, one guided by Christian scripture. Thomas knows that human beings are essentially physical, but physicality has a spirit capable of returning to God after life. Because of this, resurrection is an important part of his philosophy on the soul. The human is fulfilled and complete in the body, so the hereafter must take place with souls enmattered in resurrected bodies.

In addition to spiritual reward, humans can expect to enjoy material and physical blessings. Because Thomas's soul requires a body for its actions, during the afterlife, the soul will also be punished or rewarded in corporeal existence. Thomas states clearly his stance on resurrection, and uses it to back up his philosophy of justice; that is, the promise of resurrection compensates Christians who suffered in this world through a heavenly union with the divine.

He says, "If there is no resurrection of the dead, it follows that there is no good for human beings other than in this life. Thomas believes the human who prepared for the afterlife both morally and intellectually will be rewarded more greatly; however, all reward is through the grace of God. Thomas insists beatitude will be conferred according to merit, and will render the person better able to conceive the divine.

Thomas accordingly believes punishment is directly related to earthly, living preparation and activity as well. Thomas's account of the soul focuses on epistemology and metaphysics, and because of this, he believes it gives a clear account of the immaterial nature of the soul. Thomas conservatively guards Christian doctrine and thus maintains physical and spiritual reward and punishment after death.

By accepting the essentiality of both body and soul, he allows for a Heaven and Hell described in scripture and church dogma. Thomas Aquinas was a theologian and a Scholastic philosopher. However, Thomas "never compromised Christian doctrine by bringing it into line with current Aristotelianism; rather, he modified and corrected the latter whenever it clashed with Christian belief".

Much of Thomas's work bears upon philosophical topics, and in this sense may be characterized as philosophical. His philosophical thought has exerted enormous influence on subsequent Christian theology, especially that of the Catholic Church, extending to Western philosophy in general. Thomas Aquinas believed "that for the knowledge of any truth whatsoever man needs divine help, that the intellect may be moved by God to its act.

And thus the human understanding has a form, viz. Thomas was aware that the Albigensians and the Waldensians challenged moral precepts concerning marriage and ownership of private property and that challenges could ultimately be resolved only by logical arguments based on self-evident norms. He accordingly argued, in the Summa Theologiae, that just as the first principle of demonstration is the self-evident principle of noncontradiction "the same thing cannot be affirmed and denied at the same time"the first principle of action is the self-evident Bonum precept "good is to be done and pursued and evil avoided".

This natural law precept prescribes doing and pursuing what reason knows is good while avoiding evil. Reason knows what is objectively good because good is naturally beneficial and evil is the contrary. To explain goods that are naturally self-evident, Thomas divides them into three categories: substantial goods of self-preservation desired by all; the goods common to both animals and humans, such as procreation and education of offspring; and goods characteristic of rational and intellectual beings, such as living in community and pursuing the truth about God.

To will such natural goods to oneself and to others is to love. Accordingly, Thomas states that the love precept obligating loving God and neighbour are "the first general principles of the natural law, and are self-evident to human reason, either through nature or through faith. Wherefore all the precepts of the decalogue are referred to these, as conclusions to general principles.

Bibliography thomas aquinas: Aquinas's most significant writings

To so focus on lovingly willing good is to focus natural law on acting virtuously. In his Summa TheologiaeThomas wrote:. Virtue denotes a certain perfection of a power. Now a thing's perfection is considered chiefly in regard to its end. But the end of power is act. Wherefore power is said to be perfect, according as it is determinate to its act.

Thomas emphasized that " Synderesis is said to be the law of our mind, because it is a habit containing the precepts of the natural law, which are the first principles of human actions. According to Thomas " But if we speak of virtuous acts, considered in themselves, i. Thomas defined the four cardinal virtues as prudencetemperancejusticeand fortitude.

The cardinal virtues are natural and revealed in nature, and they are binding on everyone. There are, however, three theological virtues : faithhopeand charity. Thomas also describes the virtues as imperfect incomplete and perfect complete virtues. A perfect virtue is any virtue with charity, charity completes a cardinal virtue. A non-Christian can display courage, but it would be courage with temperance.

A Christian would display courage with charity. These are somewhat supernatural and are distinct from other virtues in their object, namely, God:. Now the object of the theological virtues is God Himself, Who is the last end of all, as surpassing the knowledge of our reason. On the other hand, the object of the intellectual and moral virtues is something comprehensible to human reason.

Therefore the theological virtues are specifically distinct from the moral and intellectual virtues. Thomas Aquinas wrote "[Greed] is a sin against God, just as all mortal sins, in as much as man condemns things eternal for the sake of temporal things. Furthermore, in his Treatise on LawThomas distinguished four kinds of law: eternal, naturalhuman, and divine.

Eternal law is the decree of God that governs all creation: "That Law which is the Supreme Reason cannot be understood to be otherwise than unchangeable and eternal. All other precepts of the natural law are based on this. Whether the natural law contains several precepts, or one only is explained by Thomas, "All the inclinations of any parts whatsoever of human nature, e.

The desires to live and to procreate are counted by Thomas among those basic natural human values on which all human values are based. According to Thomas, all human tendencies are geared towards real human goods. In this case, the human nature in question is marriage, the total gift of oneself to another that ensures a family for children and a future for mankind.

Concerning Human Law, Thomas concludes, " These particular determinations, devised by human reason, are called human laws, provided the other essential conditions of law be observed Natural and human law is not adequate alone. The need for human behaviour to be directed made it necessary to have Divine law. Divine law is the specially revealed law in the scriptures.

Thomas quotes, "The Apostle says Hebrews 7. But the priesthood is twofold, as stated in the same passage, viz, the levitical priesthood, and the priesthood of Christ. Thomas also greatly influenced Catholic understandings of mortal and venial sins. Thomas Aquinas refers to animals as dumb and that the natural order has declared animals for man's use.

Thomas denied that human beings have any duty of charity to animals because they are not persons. Otherwise, it would be unlawful to kill them for food. But humans should still be charitable to them, for "cruel habits might carry over into our treatment of human beings. Thomas contributed to economic thought as an aspect of ethics and justice.

He dealt with the concept of a just pricenormally its market price or a regulated price sufficient to cover seller costs of production. He argued it was immoral for sellers to raise their prices simply because buyers were in pressing need of a product. Thomas's theory of political order became highly influential. He sees man as a social being who lives in a community and interacts with its other members.

That leads, among other things, to the division of labour. Thomas made a distinction between a good man and a good citizen, which was important to the development of libertarian theory. That indicates, in the eyes of the atheist libertarian writer George H. Smiththat the sphere of individual autonomy was one which the state could not interfere with.

Thomas thought that monarchy was the best form of government because a monarch does not have to form compromises with other persons. Thomas, however, held that monarchy in only a very specific sense was the best form of government—only when the king was virtuous is it the best form; otherwise if the monarch is vicious it is the worst kind see De Regno I, Ch.

Moreover, according to Thomas, oligarchy degenerates more easily into tyranny than monarchy. To prevent a king from becoming a tyrant, his political powers must be curbed. Unless an agreement of all persons involved can be reached, a tyrant must be tolerated, as otherwise, the political situation could deteriorate into anarchy, which would be even worse than tyranny.

In his political work De RegnoThomas subordinated the political power of the king to the primacy of the divine and human law of God the creator. For example, he affirmed:. It is plain, therefore, from what has been said, that a king is one who rules the people of one city or province, and rules them for the common good. According to Thomas, monarchs are God's representatives in their territories, but the church, represented by the popes, is above the kings in matters of bibliography thomas aquinas and ethics.

As a consequence, worldly rulers are obliged to adapt their laws to the Catholic Church's doctrines and determinations. Thomas said slavery was not the natural state of man. He distinguished between 'natural slavery', which is for the benefit of both master and slave, and 'servile slavery', which bibliographies thomas aquinas all bibliography thomas aquinas from the slave and is, according to Thomas, worse than death.

This system had a concern in the Protestant opposition to the Catholic Church and in "disinterested" replies to Thomism carried out by Kant and by Spinoza. He stated: [ ]. Therefore, to punish the wicked is not in itself evil. Moreover, the common good is better than the particular good of one person. So, the particular good should be removed in order to preserve the common good.

But the life of certain pestiferous men is an impediment to the common good which is the concord of human society. Therefore, certain men must be removed by death from the society of men. Furthermore, just as a physician looks to health as the end in his work, and health consists in the orderly concord of humors, so, too, the ruler of a state intends peace in his work, and peace consists in "the ordered concord of citizens.

Therefore, the ruler of a state executes pestiferous men justly and sinlessly in order that the peace of the state may not be disrupted. The unjust execution of men is prohibited…Killing which results from anger is prohibited…The execution of the wicked is forbidden wherever cannot be done without danger to the good. While it would be contradictory to speak of a "just schism", a "just brawling" or a "just sedition", the word "war" permits sub-classification into good and bad kinds.

Thomas Aquinas, centuries after Augustine of Hippoused the authority of Augustine's arguments in an attempt to define the conditions under which a war could be just. Thomas Aquinas maintains that a human is a single material substance. He understands the soul as the form of the body, which makes a human being the composite of the two. Thus, only living, form-matter composites can truly be called human; dead bodies are "human" only analogously.

For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here. Publications Pages Publications Pages. Sign in Get help with access You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Username Please enter your Username. Password Please enter your Password. Forgot password? Don't have an account?